Preparing to Scale Your Business

 

Scaling at any cost has become a strategic roadmap for too many companies. Over the years, it seems this is the common playbook being run by high tech startups—especially if they’re VC backed. From certain perspectives and assuming certain motivations, that can be totally understandable. Your investors are looking for 10X or even 100X returns (however unrealistic that may be), and that only happens if the companies can quickly add ridiculous amounts of users, customers, or some other measure of market capture. The problem, of course, is that most companies have no idea how to do this and how to avoid the inevitable outcome—the company grows too fast, makes some unrecoverable mistakes, and becomes another Icarus-like cautionary tale of startup failure.

Incremental growth can be challenging enough without adding unnecessary velocity. At some point, you’ll get to the fork in the road between staying at your current size and scale or deciding to take steps to grow the business. Payroll is being met. Clients are happy. Bills are being paid on time. Customers are being acquired. It could be a logical conclusion that this is a perfectly satisfactory place to remain. Most entrepreneurs, however, are not happy with their current scale, size, or capabilities. They remain focused on growth forever.

Planning to scale a business isn’t difficult, but it requires some discipline. Using Marcus Lemonis’s Three Ps approach, we can break it into those categories.

People

Scaling your human capital and capabilities is foundational for successful growth. Consider the following:

  • What jobs and tasks are the founders doing that need to be delegated? How will you prepare people to take on those responsibilities, and what resources will be required to do so?
  • Do you have the right people in the right spots?
    • Right Person + Wrong Spot = can you find a better spot/role/job for them?
    • Wrong Person + Right Spot = how will you replace that person?
    • Wrong Person + Wrong Spot = position eliminated
    • Right Person + Right Spot = congrats!
  • Whose job will be expanding or changing? How will you plan to support that change?

Product

Products don’t always scale easily.

  • How will your production and logistics requirements change? Can you make more and deliver it as efficiency at scale as you previously have?
  • Are there smaller product offerings that simply can’t scale with the rest of the product line? Do those products get eliminated?
  • Any implementation/rollout/delivery issues created with additional product sales? How will you mitigate those issues?
  • How will you preserve quality?

Process

This trips up more companies than anything else. Having processes that people can follow and execute autonomously is crucial.

  • Are your processes documented and available for people to access/review/use?
  • What processes can only be executed by specific individuals? What is the plan for eliminating that bottleneck?
  • Are your processes current and are they still relevant at scale?
  • Where are your processes likely to fail at scale and what could cause that failure? How will you try to futureproof those procedures?

This, of course, is only a partial list but cover the high points. I would say these are equally weighted and only working through one or two of these is not sufficient. Growth is exciting and is the fundamental point of having a business for most of us. Companies can grow exponentially and actually make less money than before that growth occurred if has been poorly planned.

How Small-City Startups Can Get the Funds They Need

Small cities can be uniquely positioned to help startups get up and running. With lower costs to operate, less competition for resources, and high levels of public interest in new companies spinning up, smaller markets can be great incubators. Despite those tailwinds, companies in smaller cities often struggle to find private investment funding. It’s not that there isn’t any money to be invested—quite the contrary. Most metropolitan areas have at least one anchor industry creating wealth that spans multiple generations. Economic development organizations bring public money to the table as well.

Creating a minimally viable product and proving market traction are normally required before a startup lands sizeable investment money. Building that MVP and proving market validity takes time and money that many new ventures don’t have.

When founders decide to take on a funding partner, they often think in terms of securing $500k or more. That kind of investment falls in a gap that normally goes unfunded—too small for institutional investment and too big for individual investors. Pre-revenue startups who want to raise a year’s or more worth of runway in a single round are often left without any dance partners.

The fragmented nature of private individual investors, relatively finite size of public money offering, and the follow-on investment plays of institutional funds perpetuate this seed funding gap.

Overcoming this gap requires founders to change their thinking.

Step 1: Take a strategic look at what it will take to create the MVP. Consider what kind of money and resources it requires, and strip out anything that isn’t absolutely crucial.

Step 2: Determine how you’ll prove market traction. Whether that includes landing the first customer, attracting users, or building models around credible survey data, plan for this before you ever determine how much money you’ll need to raise and how quickly you’ll need to raise it.

Step 3: Complete the financial projections to determine the amount you absolutely need to pull off Steps 1 and 2. Decide how much equity you’re willing to give up (hint: it will be more than you want to give up).

Operating under the assumption that this seed funding won’t get you very far—only to the point of launching an MVP and proving market validity—the new funding number is likely far smaller than $500k. If the numbers fall between $50k and $120k, you could very well find an individual investor or small group of investors who shares your vision and is willing to risk cash in exchange for a sizeable chunk of equity.

Once you’ve launched the MVP and proved market traction, the size and options for investment funding expand. Not only will local sources of investment be more readily available, but investors from other cities, areas, or regions may be more approachable as well. Closing the funding gap is something pre-revenue startups can do for themselves as long as they tailor their timeline, product development, and overall approach to the funding sources available.

Hire Us

Just-in-Time Resources for Entrepreneurial Businesses