Amazon’s HQ2 RFP Provided the Roadmap for a More Competitive Birmingham

237 Disappointments

Amazon received 238 submissions from 238 different cities for its request for proposal (RFP) regarding its second headquarters, HQ2. In the wake of the 237 losers will be millions of dollars and tremendous amount of energy and resources spent trying to promote hundreds of cities that didn’t qualify for even the most basic RFP requirements.

Birmingham, AL is likely to be one of the 237 disappointed cities because, for the most part, we don’t meet the minimum qualifications to submit a competitive bid

But that didn’t stop us from launching a big and—presumably expensive—advertising campaign replete with huge temporary monuments shaped like Amazon shipping boxes, oversized Amazon Dash buttons and a dozen or more feel good news stories both paid and unpaid in an attempt to woo Jeff Bezos and his selection committee.

Someone is going to win some advertising awards and get some really great news clips to frame for their office walls. It was creative and well executed. Unfortunately, much like the ill-conceived and almost criminally executed bid to land the last DNC convention, #bringAtoB will likely net the same economic impact with a monster bill to pay for the effort.

Yes, I’m one of the jerks who pushed back on this from day one of the campaign and have been called a lot of names on social media. People have been pushing the false equivalent of Mercedes choosing to build their plant in Vance as justification for opening threadbare pockets and spending money we hardly have. However, I have been far from alone in questioning the allocation of this money, effort and time when our city has so many opportunities to improve.

Simply throwing stones at the #bringAtoB campaign is not helpful however. Here is how and where that money, time and energy could have been used to move toward a city and economic environment that would have made us much more competitive not only for the Amazon bid but also for attracting other new opportunities to the area.

Provide Forgivable Small Business Loans

99.7% of the companies in the US are classified as small businesses and those businesses employ 48% of the total workforce. Many of the largest companies in Birmingham are shrinking their head count as software and technology automation requires less human capital. Regions Bank laid off approximately 260 people last year alone. Bradley (formerly BABC) laid off 13% of its administrative staff during that same time period. US Steel laid off 1,100 workers at the end of 2015.

For the sake of argument, let’s say $200k was directly allocated to the promotion of #bringAtoB. That could have translated into 10 small business loans of $20k to vetted and qualified small business operators to expand or even start their business. The BBA, Big Communications, City of Birmingham and others involved in #bringAtoB could provide additional support or resources to those new opportunities using the same amount of time and effort spent creating and launching the Amazon campaign

That’s 10 new businesses, employers and tax paying entities created for the same amount of money and time. If you took the perspective as an investor, this would be like placing 10 bets with the same amount of money as you would have placed on a single bet with a lousy prospectus. Job growth in Birmingham continues to come from small businesses and entrepreneurs- not the same big industry companies we have relied on since the 1960s to create new jobs and better opportunities.

Limit the Economic Development Fragmentation

We have the BBA, Tech Birmingham, Rev Birmingham, EDPA, Innovation Depot, Innovate Birmingham, UAB, Rotary, City Hall, City Council, Jefferson County Commission and others working on separate and disparate economic development programs. All of those organizations are funded by private contributions, membership fees, sponsorships, tax dollars or grant money. Those funding sources are finite, but we have individual groups spending money on individual staffs, salaries, operational expenses, strategic planning sessions, events, professional service providers, committee meetings, promotional advertising, grant writers and more.

The cost of that duplication is massively wasteful. Further, without a cohesive approach between all those individual groups, we end up with competing priorities and mediocre performance. As one of my mentors used to say, “there are only so many nickels in the jar.” We need to be better stewards of how we spend our limited resources. That starts with collaborating on a macro scale and setting a longer-term vision.

Create a City-Wide Transportation Plan

One of the primary requirements of the Amazon RFP was a campus with direct access to mass transit. While Birmingham has several rail spurs that run along former industrial sites, we don’t have what most cities would consider efficient and accessible mass transit. Organizations have worked to fill gaps in that plan with efforts like the Zyp Bikeshare program, but a long-term, workable transportation strategy has largely eluded us. We haven’t managed to come up with a way to connect the city with the surrounding area- like the suburbs which would provide a large percentage of the human capital required for a corporate campus the size of Amazon’s HQ2. We need to spend the money to come up with a comprehensive and effective mass-transit strategy that drags us into the 21st century.

Entrepreneurs should be Leading Entrepreneurial Efforts

By last count, there at least six local or regional organizations that exist to directly or indirectly promote the formation and growth of entrepreneurs and startups. None of those organizations are actually led by an entrepreneur. A few of them don’t have anyone on their executive staff that has been an entrepreneur or even worked for a small business or startup. There is no doubt those people can play a crucial role in the support and success of the emerging business ecosystem but we need actual entrepreneurs to be in those leadership roles. There is no amount of research or relative proximity that can replace the kinesthetic experience of being an entrepreneur or business owner.

Work Toward the Next Opportunity Now

We should be able to self-critique and have tough conversations about what we must change without the fear that doubt creates preventing us from being open to our opportunities. While celebration of incremental improvement is crucial, we must not accept shallow victories as the sum total of our achievements. We have a long way to go and we must be able to talk openly and honestly about those shortcomings and how we want to work to fix them.

As we stand in 2017, we aren’t qualified for Amazon’s HQ2. We can argue the semantics of the RFP’s wording to justify in our minds how we manage to qualify, or we can start looking inward and filling the gaps highlighted by Amazon. The RFP did provide us a potential roadmap to being far more competitive and attractive to companies like Amazon in the future. It will take a collective, long-term and disciplined effort to fill those gaps and we need to pursue that challenge with as much energy and resources as we spent on oversized Amazon shipping boxes and faux-Dash buttons.

Photo via Creative Commons user Anxo Cunningham

Event: How to Build an Effective Sales Team

As part of Hallux Training, Redhawk will be hosting a free event that explores how selling has changed and what companies need to do to build competitive sales teams. Part presentation and part discussion, this event will provide an excellent opportunity to engage with sales experts who have built multi-million dollar teams and sold into some of the largest companies in the world.

During this event, we will discuss the following topics:

  • What happens when your sales efforts go wrong…
  • Relationship selling is overrated.
  • How to build and scale a successful sales team on a budget.
  • How to hire salespeople.
  • Discounting is not a sales strategy.
  • Companies that rely on tricks and shortcuts will, ultimately, fail to reach their goals.

This event is perfect for people looking to build a sales team for the first time as well as those who are looking at ways to improve their sales effectiveness. This will be an engaging and fun event open to anyone interested in learning how to boost revenue and build competitive sales teams.

Cost: FREE
Location: Redhawk Entrepreneur Development Company, 3027 6th Avenue South 35233

Click to RSVP on Facebook or Meetup. To receive notice of future events, like us on Facebook, join our Meetup group, or request more info on Hallux Training.

Read This Before You Join an Accelerator Program

I’m not creative and have never had that moment of total clarity where I had an idea worth turning into a product and company. I’m a services entrepreneur and love what I do. However, founders and startups comprise a large segment of my client list. While I’ve never participated in an accelerator program as a founder of a startup, I’ve been involved in programs as a mentor, resource and even in organizational design projects. Over the course of the last few years, I’ve become increasingly fascinated with accelerator and incubator programs.

At their core, they represent an amazing approach to helping startups gain perspective and traction as they throw themselves into making the next great thing. What’s even more amazing is talking to the people who’ve participated in them. I’ve tried to capture the things they’ve learned and shared with me. Hopefully, this will help aspiring participants make some decisions about which program may be right for them.

There are some globally-recognized programs that have impressive lists of graduates with several branches throughout the world. Techstars, Y-Combinator and others are the Ivy League of accelerators. They take the top 3% of the applicant pool. Their programming, mentorship and cohort selection breeds success on a scale not realized on other platforms. If you are selected to participate in either of those programs, you definitely should.

Most startups won’t be granted a spot in one those programs, but with the proliferation of smaller accelerators, you may find some that are worthwhile. There are several new programs gaining an incredible reputation after only a few cohorts.

First, let me start with the basics.

  • Most accelerators will offer some kind of seed/award/prize money for being in the program. You don’t always get it up front. You may get it in a series of smaller payments or after clearing certain hurdles.
  • These programs are broken into cohorts between 5 and 20 companies depending on their format and programming. It is most common to see 10 companies in a cohort.
  • Programs usually take place over 12-14 weeks.
  • Within these accelerators, you will’ve some kind of administrator or director, an entrepreneur in residence (EIR), mentors and investors. Some programs will have a stratified management layer of managing and non-managing “members.”

These accelerators can attract some amazing talent and be a critical springboard for your startup—provided you pick one best positioned for you.

Here are a couple of things to consider when picking a program:

Who’s Running it?

The directors, EIR and management should be successful entrepreneurs. You should look for programs where the leadership has been successful in a specific aspect of business where you also need to succeed. If you must generate revenue and scale your business, an EIR who exited their previous company with $2 million in debt may not be a good fit for you. Accelerators can become a form of “business welfare” where friends and associates who are otherwise unqualified to serve in those capacities get lucrative EIR positions or board seats.

It’s also a huge benefit when the leadership has been through an accelerator program—especially a prestigious one. Nate Schmidt of the Velocity Accelerator in Birmingham is a Techstars graduate and will be able to relate to his cohorts in a powerful way.

General and Specialized Accelerators

Specialization is an encouraging new trend in accelerators. Instead of operating general “tech” accelerators, savvy programs are starting to look for the underserved or emerging industries ripe for innovation. The Dynamo Accelerator in Chattanooga and Boomtown Healthtech in Boulder are great examples of this kind of specialization. By focusing on a specific market, they can attract better companies and highly qualified industry experts as mentors and programming that focuses on the specific challenges of that industry.

Funding Sources

Consider the motivations of those who are funding the program. For accelerators that have industry or venture capital support as their main source of operating cash, you may see a higher level of execution and greater sense of accountability than those backed primarily by academic or municipal stakeholders. For the former, they are participating to make money, benefit from the innovation created and boost their prestige as an accelerator. For the latter, the PR alone is often worth the cost of the program. They are largely spending tax money from a general budget or endowments that were granted out of philanthropic interests. If it is successful, that’s a bonus, but they win simply by participating and launching the program. That isn’t to assert those can’t be successful or that industry giants don’t get significant positive PR from sponsoring an accelerator. Understanding what the “money” gets from providing the funding is worth considering.

Benefits Provided other than Money

Excellent programming, mentors, EIRs and leadership can make an under-funded or new accelerator incredibly worthwhile. The inverse is true as well. Top programs should be actively helping you connect with important outside resources and finding new customers even before the program is over.

The mentors can be an incredible source of business deals and networking—provided they are the kinds of mentors you need. Are you building the next great wearable technology? Maybe you should take a second look at that roster of mentors dominated by bankers and lawyers.

Participants in the Cohorts

I’ve heard from dozens of accelerator graduates who’ve talked about how much they gained from the other participants in their cohort. These success stories range from finding their new CIO to merging with another graduate.

Are the other companies as hungry as you are—financially and ambitiously—or are they simply taking easy money to half-heartedly pursue a side project while they maintain their full-time salaried job? I’ve seen some startups play the system by participating in as many accelerators, launch programs and competitions as possible to generate cash. I know of one company that participated in three programs in 2016 alone.

Are they from various parts of the country or world or are they all from the same place? That may not matter to you, but if every company comes from the same town, you’ll sacrifice the unique perspectives only a diverse cohort can provide.

Choosing to participate in an accelerator is a big decision. The time it takes to even apply is a significant commitment. Make sure you consider what you want to get out of the experience and whether the programs you are considering can deliver.

Hire Us

Just-in-Time Resources for Entrepreneurial Businesses