Why You Should Share Your Profits with Millennials

Like two warring factions, there is a pro-millennial camp and an anti-millennial camp who rigorously debate the benefits and challenges of a growing Gen Y workforce. On the pro side, millennials are celebrated for their ideals and stubborn vision of disrupting the status quo. On the con side, they are viewed as narcissistic, lazy and entitled neophytes who almost refuse to work a meaningful 40 hours per week.

I have wrestled with these opposing perspectives in real-world applications. Many of my clients have owners that struggle with this emerging workforce as they feel “forced” to hire increasing numbers of millennials. This collision of establishment and new order mentalities leads to strife in almost everything they try to accomplish as an organization. Even office parties can become a blood-letting as opposing views on the importance of cultural sensitivity, dietary considerations and inclusionary activities battle for dominance.

Once you spend some time working in this push and pull between the old guard and new workforce, you start to see where common ground may exist.

Money.

Regardless of age or the corporate cultures you cut your teeth on, money still creates a bridge between the two sides. Despite the popular notion that millennials aren’t driven to acquire material possessions, that just isn’t the statistical truth.

According to Goldman Sachs’ survey of millennials in 2015, 30% said they have little interest in buying a home and 33% said they have no plans to buy a car. For a minute, let’s consider the counterpoint of those numbers. With the inverse nature of percentages, this survey also shows 70% of millennials want to buy a house and 66% plan to buy a car. Additionally, many millennials are carrying crippling student debt and entering an employment market that is increasingly tight as the sharing economy grows without a correlating growth in job creation. Even if millennials don’t want to focus on the accumulation of money or wealth, they are bound by the same economic realities as people twice their age. Even if money may be motivating for Generation X and seen as a necessary evil by Generation Y, they both understand it’s role.

I worked with a client who rolled out a performance plan for all employees that paid an additional 15% of their current salaries as a bonus at year end€”provided they met revenue and profit margin goals. This company is comprised almost 100% of Gen X management and 100% of Gen Y front line employees. Previously, they had not published strategic goals and had no meaningful monetary incentive for reaching specific performance levels. This straight-forward program created a 26% increase in top line revenue, and net income grew 135% in one year.

What we found was a millennial workforce that still had enough need wrapped around money that they worked hard to make this bonus. I also believe the very nature of working toward a common goal provided a sense of purpose and community. For the first time, there was some consensus between the Gen Y and Gen X populations.

Even with some massive checks being written by the owners of the company to pay those bonuses, there was little pain in signing them. The program was a massive success for them personally and professionally. After backing out the bonuses, they still had one of their highest profit margins ever.

I’m not suggesting to simply throw money at a millennial workforce and consider the problem solved. I am suggesting that a thoughtful approach to using it as starting point has merit. Here are some things to think through when considering a profit-sharing program.

Tie the Money to Performance Goals
The business should benefit from the program and the program actually gains meaning when it is tied to some achievement. It helps to create alignment and shared purpose. Without goals to reach, the bonus becomes the corporate version of a participation trophy.

Pick 3 Goals that Everyone Impacts
Don’t pick 12 metrics to hit. That’s just wasting your time. Pick 3 that really matter and that everyone in the organization can impact.

Measure and Share Constantly
Progress toward a goal or series of metrics should be measured and shared as often as possible. Remember, you are working with millennials who are used to information being available on-demand and in real time. Publish the results or progress with the highest frequency possible. Internal social media programs are great conduits for this.

Create Meaning Behind the Goals
Use the opportunity to explain why these goals are important to the employees as well as the company. Revenue improvement can mean expansion and more opportunities for the employees. Excellent profit margins represent ownership’s ability to reinvest in the business which can mean growth in a number of ways. If you spend some time explaining the what’s-in-it-for-me (WIIFM) components to the program, you can maximize the motivation.

It’s important to recognize that many of us Gen X’rs wanted the same things as these “millennials.” We wanted our work to matter, to be recognized for our achievements and have the opportunity for rapid advancement. The only difference is we folded like cheap shirts when our parent’s generation said no. I admire that Gen Y is being so hard-headed. I think many of us old curmudgeons are envious of their resolve.

Again, I don’t believe this is some magic bullet to solve all disconnects between a millennial workforce and Gen X management but it provides one bridge between the two. If you are an owner or manager currently ignoring this dynamic or believe it will go away, consider there are 50% more millennials than Gen X’rs. At some point, if it hasn’t happened already, your workforce will be more Y than X so you need to focus on how you can engage and motivate them.

Millennials aren’t bad, you’re just old

Maybe more than any other topic that keeps coming up for older founders and business owners is how to “deal” with a Millennial workforce. Here is the definition of a Millennial according to Urban Dictionary:

“Special little snowflake. Born between 1982 and 1994 this generation is something special, ’cause Mom and Dad and their 5th grade teacher Mrs. Winotsky told them so. Plus they have a whole shelf of participation trophies sitting at home so it has to be true.”

Terms like entitled, self-important, lazy and narcissistic have been used when referring to millennials. Even the preceding definition nods to the pervasive belief that Millennials are some kind of malfunctioning adult.

Participate in the bashing long enough and you start to sound a little like your mom or dad who just couldn’t fathom hip-hop music, those dirty plaid shirts (that seem to be back in style) or why everyone is fascinated with that “interweb” thing.

I barely fall outside this birth range but started my professional career early enough to have been indoctrinated into the “old” business model. In my first job, the salespeople had to print everything for our boss to read because he refused to learn how email worked and Office Managers were still referred to as “Secretaries.”

Millennials frustrate and anger people who are used to the old way of doing business. Andy White, Founder of City as a Startup, brilliantly speaks about the shift in business culture from our previous generation’s manufacturing model. This manufacturing model relied on organizational charts, finely written manuals, individual contributors and deference to corporate dogma where the new workplace replaces those with shared goals, shared accomplishments and shared experiences.

Here is a great article from Fast Company that explains what Millennials want and don’t want. It also speaks to some strategies to draw the best out of them.

Before you disregard all of this, consider a couple of things.

  • Millennials will be 75% of the workforce in the next 10 years.
  • There are far more millennials in the workforce than owners of companies.
  • Organizations need these young professionals and they better help them be successful.

Millennials represent a significant change in how businesses are managed and that scares the hell out of some people. In a true reflection of poor human behavior, this fear translates into the dismissal of Millennial’s motivations as frivolous or selfish.

Being the proverbial grumpy old man or woman starting every discussion about your young employees with “Back in my day…” has grown tiresome and is as worthless now as it was the first time you muttered it.

There is little reason to believe businesses can’t thrive by embracing this shift and engaging their employees in more meaningful ways.
If you are struggling with all of this- get over it. You need to realize you have an opportunity to hire people who will care more deeply about their work than ever before. If you can’t make that transition, maybe it’s time to stop blaming “lazy” Millennials and start considering your “lazy” leadership.

“It’s not me, it’s you…” How not to be the world’s worst boss

George Constanza claimed to have invented the “It’s not you, it’s me” breakup line. He then goes on to elaborate, “Nobody tells me it’s them, not me. If it’s anybody, it’s me.” People are guilty of using this cliché to let someone down easily but we know the opposite can be the more truthful statement. It’s not me, it’s you.

I was recently cleaning out some files from a previous job and I came across a piece of paper that hung in my office as an affirmation of how I was trying to lead my team. This isn’t a Steve Jobs motivational quote or a picture of a cat encouraging me to “Hang in there.” This was actually something I lifted from an article listing the five things a bad boss does. Preferring to be more proactive, I re-wrote it in the affirmative to read as all the things a good leader does and hung it on the wall directly in front of my desk and in plain sight for anyone to see.

I had a horrible boss at the time. He regularly committed most of the “don’t do” items on the original edition of the list and, over time, his poor leadership drove me to start questioning my own abilities. It drives me nuts I can’t remember where I found this because it was a massive help to me when I needed it most. I realized it wasn’t me; it was him that had failed. Sometimes it really is someone else who has screwed up and you can accept that’s on them.

It’s not me, it is you.

Below is the list and if you are a leader of people, ask yourself if you are doing these things. If you aren’t why?

  1. Don’t question everything. Trust your peoples’ knowledge or experience or unique expertise. Don’t bulldoze in on every decision and make snap judgements based on what limited information you’ve been able to glean from a status report or something you overheard while refilling your coffee.
  2. Don’t abandon ship. Have an employee’s back. Never call an individual out and shame him or her when some element of a project goes sideways.
  3. Don’t play favorites. Acknowledge each employee’s strengths and weaknesses and use this understanding to build powerfully effective teams. Don’t choose one “pet” employee who does one thing well and hold them up as the standard by which all performance must be measured.
  4. Lead with requests, not demands. Give people time to complete the task and don’t ask for things in a shorter time frame just to sit on the decision or action for weeks. Ask for their participation and input- resist dictating it. Show them the “WIIFM.” (What’s In It For Me)
  5. Never intimidate, obfuscate or manipulate. Remember that the atmosphere you create for your team starts with you. Be consistent in how you respond to issues. Don’t alternate between bouts of compassion and irrational flares of rage. Be transparent as much as possible with information.

So what did I miss? Leave a comment below to add to the list or challenge one I have listed.

Start by Firing Everyone

Early on in my career, I was asked to take over a regional service company with over 280 technicians and operating in 4 states. Having worked for another company in the same ownership portfolio, I was very familiar with the business I was tasked to take over and even assisted them with some management development stuff along the way.

Standing in the owner’s kitchen, I was offered the position and before I could even censor myself, I blurted out,

“I don’t really have the resume for this but I will work my ass off to make it work. And… I’m probably going to fire all of your managers…”

Not unlike other small businesses that grew quickly, the company had taken its high performers from front line positions and promoted them into management. Truthfully, this can work but it takes a special kind of talent to make this transition. They didn’t have many special talents.

The company was facing their first possibility of losing money in the business despite being busier than they had ever been. Productivity, quality and employee retention were all down dramatically.

True to my word and over the next two years, I did work my ass off and I did fire almost all of the office managers. Some were incompetent, some were bullying their staff and some were even stealing. Firing people sucks- except the one that was bullying his staff. I still reflect on that being the only time I’ve fired someone and actually enjoyed doing it. He was a jerk and he was treating our people like garbage.

I didn’t issue pink slips from a corporate office on a Monday- administratively eliminating all the managers in one big sweep. We took some time to understand each circumstance which either confirmed or disputed our belief in each manager’s ability to drive the business forward. We talked to their techs, their warehouse managers, their office managers and even the people in central operations about how each of them was performing. Pretty soon, we didn’t need to ask the questions- people were coming to us with feedback and suggestions.

We also changed the pay from a seniority model to a performance tier system, retrained techs, replaced the fired managers with a mix of internal and external folks, bought new equipment and tools, developed professional operating practices and even added a middle tier of management to push the transition. There was much more but listing it all is tedious reading and tangential.

The company turned the corner over an 18 month period driving up productivity almost 50%, reducing turnover 60%, opening two new offices, growing to over 400 technicians and adding almost 30% more revenue. The best part was the profitability was higher than ever.

As a business grows in size, complexity or depth, you will have people who can make the transition and those who can’t. Can you development them? Are they worth developing? Do they embrace and promote your company’s culture?

I have seen where companies don’t ask these questions because they are afraid of the answer- they have folks that can’t or won’t take the next steps with them. You know the symptoms of those decisions; people are shuffled around into different positions without increasing responsibilities, new hires and installed around them to fill gaps in ability and even creating positions for people that are unnecessary or redundant.

Making these decisions comes with sleepless nights and repeated moral compass calibrations but not making these hard choices can cost you your profit margin or worse.

How “Talented” is your Talent Management Team?

We like fancy terms for things in the consulting world. We speak about KPIs, contribution margins and the cost of capital to name a few. Similarly, hiring and development functions have been turned into “Talent Management” which has always sounded a bit more like the job description for someone sitting behind a dais on American Idol, but in fairness, is probably a better term than simply HR.

Recently, I drafted a detailed selection strategy for a client who was using it to enforce the quality of candidates serving their company through a vendor. A little complicated but stick with me. I created the components of what my experience has shown to be important in hiring and retaining the best people.

  1. Candidate Profile- the skills and attributes needed to be successful in the role for which they are hired. Often, top performers are used as reference subjects and their attributes are used for modeling this profile.
  2. Resume Screening- scoring resumes based on the match to the Candidate Profile; the higher the score, the more likely the candidate gets an interview or phone screen.
  3. Situational Interview- questions centered on demonstrated behaviors during specific and actual circumstances that are likely to be replicated in the role for which you are hiring.

Very proud of myself, I presented this to the client’s vendor and expected some kind of appreciative response considering the detail and amount of work I had put into this effort. Instead, I was told they already had a great process and I needed to see what they were already doing. Having more than a few reservations based on their past performance, I agreed to review what they sent me.

About 5 days later, I received what was supposed to be their comprehensive hiring and development program. It was three documents. It had typos all over it. It lacked any kind of detail. It was in multiple languages (not kidding). It had a grammar test that had grammatical errors in the instructions.

Worst of all were the interview questions. They were hiring for sales agents and these were the only questions they were asking:

  1. What is the most significant historical event in the last decade?
  2. If you were president for an hour, what would you do to improve the quality of life for citizens?
  3. Do you agree with the following statement, “Money can’t buy happiness but it can rent it for an hour or two.”

These questions are what you ask an eighth grade student running for president of the debate club, not an adult salesperson in a professional environment. None of these questions will help predict the future performance of the candidate in the role for which you are hiring.

This speaks to the importance of your talent management team and the processes employed to attract, develop and retain the best possible people for your organization.

Think about the basic math of turnover even at entry level positions. Conservatively, let’s assume you have a total cost to hire, onboard, and train to the point of proficiency of $5,000 per person. According to the US Bureau of Labor and Statistics, total separations in February 2015 was 3%. This annualizes to 36%. If you follow this national average and have a small employee base of 25- an arbitrary number- you will replace nine employees per year at a total cost of $45,000. If you successfully improved your retention by 30%, you would see savings of $13,500.

We can get into the breakdown of what causes this turnover and some of it is probably healthy- some people needed to go or wanted to leave. At the most basic level though, it remains about fit and that starts with the hiring process. Top talent is in demand and you will be competing to attract it.

So you have to ask yourself if your Talent Management team is talented enough to get and keep top talent.

Are your employees planning to “clunk” or “clink?”

A successful banker goes into the Cadillac dealership and selects the most expensive car in the showroom floor. With every option available, a special paint job and premium price, the banker proudly takes the keys to his new car and drives away from the dealership.

Within 2 miles, the new owner hears a distinct “clunk-clink” coming from somewhere inside the car. Quickly dismissing it, he continues driving down the road. A few minutes later, he hears the same “clunk-clink” sound again. Irritated, he immediately turns the car around and drives back to the dealership.

After some choice words with the salesman, the dealership takes the car around to the shop and pulls every mechanic over to the Cadillac to figure out what is making the sound. After several hours of unsuccessfully replicating the sound, the dealership sends the banker on his way- assuring him there was nothing to be found and the car is in perfect working order.

The following morning, the dealership sales manager arrives at work to find the same customer standing at the front door with a less-than pleasant expression on his face. The “clunk-clink” was still there and if the dealership couldn’t fix it today, the customer was going to demand a full refund.

Again, every mechanic in the shop was assigned the task of finding this rattle. By lunch, they still hadn’t found anything wrong. Exasperated, the sales manager told the mechanics to tear the whole car apart- they were going to find the source of this “clunk-clink.”

With the entire engine bay, suspension and interior stripped out of the car, the chief mechanic slammed the driver’s door in disgust and finally heard a distinct “clunk-clink.” Opening the door back up and grabbing a flashlight to look into the inner door panel, he saw what looked like a glass bottle. Reaching down into the lowest portions of the door sill, he fished out an empty soda bottle that had a rolled up piece of paper in it.

After removing the paper from the bottle and unrolling it, he started reading a scrawled note clearly written with a worker’s hand. It read, “So, you finally found the rattle, you rich son-of-a-bitch.”

While this story was long-ago proven to be completely fabricated, it is a colorful way of demonstrating the damage a disgruntled employee can do to your product or reputation. Hopefully, you have never experienced an employee going to extreme lengths like this to demonstrate their dissatisfaction. Consider that an employee’s level of engagement or “buy-in” to the company’s efforts is more likely to be somewhere on a continuum between this extreme low and demonstrating complete ownership of their role and the organization’s well-being.

While an employee may not outright sabotage your reputation with a customer, they can make a series of choices that benefit them personally and fall outside of the company’s best interest. Those smaller choices are still damaging and undermine your organization over a period of time.

The days of employees just being happy to have a job and showing that gratitude by working hard and unselfishly are over. Even as job markets stutter, people are looking to work where they can be engaged in ways that go beyond pay and benefits. Increasingly, employee engagement comes from how the job or company makes them feel about themselves.

Are you engaging employees in ways that make them feel valued, respected, even loved? The intrinsic rewards of working somewhere are important and that includes how they feel about the company and their role within it.

Do you have a “Cadillac” story to share? If so, comment below or email me at matt.hottle@redhawkresults.com.

If you have a Buzz, you may have a Woody

For anyone who has kids or is a kid at heart, you have probably seen the movie Toy Story. It is a great movie and introduced Pixar’s technology which became the gold-standard by which all other computer animation would be judged.

For the Toy Story uninitiated, Woody is a pull-string talking cowboy and the favorite toy of Andy, the child who owns him and the main human character in the movie. They are inseparable.

Andy has a birthday where he is given a Buzz Lightyear action figure. Buzz has a flip down helmet visor, pop-out wings and a laser on his arm. Compared to the rather mundane Woody, Buzz is wildly exciting. Immediately, Buzz takes Woody’s place as the favorite and as Buzz gets all the benefits of being the “favorite,” Woody goes from denial to depression and then, ultimately, tries to off Buzz. That’s right, Pixar goes a little dark at that point in the movie.

Spoiler alert- the movie has a happy ending.

Most successful and growing organizations, at some point, start to get their pick of the job-seeking candidate pool. Your business has done well and has built a great reputation; enough to attract the best talent and that is very exciting. With the ability to add expertise and fill organizational gaps, access to increased expertise through these new hires can really accelerate growth and success.

It is also very easy to treat a new “high performer” like a trophy for which lavish on-boarding programs are deployed and public recognition of their past success is broadcast throughout the organization. Detailed and thoughtful on-boarding is crucial to a company’s ability to attract and retain top talent. There are reams of white papers dedicated to the short and long-term benefits these programs provide. I strongly agree with them.

So, like Andy in Toy Story, you now have a Buzz. You still have a Woody too.

Chances are, your Buzz partially or completely displaced your Woody.

Your Woody likely has been with the organization for a long time and is loyal and eager. He was, at one point, your Buzz. He has tremendous institutional knowledge and has been consistently successful in the roles for which he has been responsible.

While the arrival of your “Buzz” has been heralded with much fanfare, your “Woody” is not so sure about what this new hire means for him or her. Unrecognized, Woody may start to act in ways that are counter-productive or even engage in outright sabotage.

When hiring new talent, make sure you look at the onboarding process from both sides. Don’t solely focus on how you want the new hire to experience your organization but also that person’s impact to all of your “Woodys.” Do people understand why this person is being hired and how that will affect them directly? Are they being included in the hiring process and if their role is changing because of this new hire, do they understand what that means for their own future in the organization?

If you take a dual-perspective view to bringing on new talent, you can have a happy ending as well.

Have you ever been a “Buzz” or “Woody?” If so, drop me an email. I’d love to hear how you worked through it (or didn’t).

Hire Us

Just-in-Time Resources for Entrepreneurial Businesses